The EU’s packaging rules aim to make requirements more consistent across member states. Small businesses selling into several countries may still face separate registration, reporting and representation obligations.
A small brand can use the same box or pouch for every order it sends to customers in the European Union. Its packaging compliance work can still change with the destination.
Discover B2B Marketing That Performs
Combine business intelligence and editorial excellence to reach engaged professionals across 36 leading media platforms.
That is a practical challenge as the EU’s Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR) takes effect. The regulation creates common requirements covering areas such as recyclability, recycled content, labelling and reuse. Extended producer responsibility (EPR), however, still operates through national systems for registering businesses and financing the management of packaging waste.
For a small exporter, selling into another EU country can therefore raise several questions: who is responsible for the packaging, what information must be reported, and is an authorised representative required?
The PPWR entered into force on 11 February 2025 and began to apply on 12 August 2026, with some requirements taking effect later. It replaces the previous EU Packaging and Packaging Waste Directive.
Its aim is to create a more harmonised packaging market. But that does not mean a seller can manage every EPR obligation through one EU-wide registration.
Who is responsible for the packaging?
An exporter first needs to establish which business is the producer for EPR purposes in each market. In this context, producer is a legal role. It does not necessarily mean the company that manufactured the box, bottle or pouch.
Responsibility depends on how packaging or packaged products reach a market. A brand selling directly to customers, a business importing goods and a retailer buying through an intermediary can occupy different positions in the supply chain.
The involvement of a distributor, fulfilment provider or online marketplace does not, on its own, establish that another party has taken responsibility for the seller’s packaging.
Under the PPWR, producers must register in each member state where they first make packaging or packaged products available, subject to the regulation’s provisions. Member states can allow certain EPR obligations to be handled by an authorised representative or a producer responsibility organisation.
EPR duties can include registration, reporting packaging quantities and materials, and contributing to the cost of managing packaging waste.
The work involved can weigh more heavily on a small business. A large company can spread the cost of gathering data and managing compliance across a high volume of sales. An exporter serving several markets with relatively few orders may face similar initial work with fewer sales over which to recover the cost.
Why packaging data matters
To assess its obligations, a seller needs to know what packaging accompanies each product and where that packaging is supplied.
Depending on the market and reporting requirement, it may need information on packaging types, materials, weights and quantities placed on each market. The PPWR itself sets reporting requirements based on packaging categories and quantities.
That information can be held by several businesses.
A converter may have the specification for a carton. A brand owner may know how it is used with the finished product. A fulfilment provider may add a shipping box and protective material before dispatch.
If those records cannot be connected, reporting becomes harder. Changes to a pack format or shipping arrangement can also make previously collected figures unreliable.
For packaging suppliers, dependable component specifications are therefore increasingly useful to customers managing EPR. For brand owners, connecting those specifications to sales by destination can make it easier to assess the work involved in entering another market.
Businesses should still check the reporting categories and procedures that apply in each country rather than assuming that the same process will apply everywhere.
When is an authorised representative required?
Cross-border EPR rules can require a producer to appoint an authorised representative in a country where it has no establishment. The position for a particular exporter depends on the applicable rules and its route to market.
Germany shows how the requirement can work.
Since 12 August 2026, businesses based outside Germany with no German branch must appoint a Germany-based authorised representative when they sell empty packaging or packaged products directly to end users in Germany without an intermediary retailer. The representative takes on the relevant EPR duties, while the producer remains responsible for its registration in the LUCID Packaging Register. Germany’s packaging register also states that representatives charge for their services.
For a seller with relatively few German orders, that can create a meaningful fixed cost of serving the market.
Germany is an illustration of the issue, rather than a guide to the exact procedure in every EU country. Exporters need to establish the applicable requirements in each destination market.
Nor should a business assume that its size removes these obligations.
The European Commission says micro-enterprises are subject to lighter rules under the PPWR. But this does not amount to a blanket exemption from packaging EPR. The relevant provision and any applicable threshold need to be checked before a business relies on relief.
Will harmonisation help smaller sellers?
Common packaging requirements could make it easier to develop a format for several EU markets. The PPWR also aims to reduce packaging waste, improve recyclability and encourage greater use of recycled materials and reusable packaging.
The distinction for exporters is between harmonising packaging requirements and simplifying EPR administration.
A business may benefit from common rules on packaging design while still dealing with national registers, reporting arrangements and representative requirements.
The administrative burden remains a subject of EU debate.
In June 2026, the Council said it had discontinued negotiations on two proposals concerning EPR authorised representatives after strong reservations from a large majority of member states. It said a wider review of EPR frameworks was expected in autumn 2026.
On 16 September 2026, the European Parliament also debated the impact of PPWR implementation on small and medium-sized enterprises, including administrative burdens and challenges for the European Single Market. The parliamentary procedure was completed that day.
These developments show that the practical impact of EPR administration on smaller businesses remains under discussion. They do not, however, remove obligations already in force.
What should businesses check before entering another market?
A brand considering sales into another EU country should first map how its products will reach customers and establish who holds EPR responsibility in that market.
It can then:
- identify every packaging component involved;
- gather reliable material and weight data;
- record the quantities supplied to each destination;
- check the applicable registration and reporting requirements;
- establish any EPR fees that apply; and
- determine whether an authorised representative is required.
Where a distributor, fulfilment provider or marketplace is involved, the business should establish which compliance tasks that party actually performs. Its role should be confirmed rather than assumed.
Packaging suppliers can support the process by keeping component specifications accurate and accessible. Brand owners can keep those records aligned with changes to products, packaging formats and shipping arrangements.
This makes packaging data an increasingly important part of cross-border supply-chain management.
The test for small exporters
The PPWR’s longer-term aim is a more consistent European packaging market, with common requirements that support recycling, reuse and waste reduction.
For small exporters, however, its success will also be measured in practical terms.
Common packaging rules could make it easier to expand across the EU. But those benefits will be harder to realise if entering each additional market brings substantial fixed administrative costs.
For the packaging industry, the issue therefore extends beyond packaging design.
How easily businesses can establish EPR responsibility, collect accurate packaging data and meet requirements across borders will help determine how accessible the EU market is for sellers of all sizes.
