Who would be in packaging procurement right now?
Raw materials volatility has become the defining feature of the global packaging sector. In an industry where input costs frequently represent 50% or more of total manufactured product expenses, deciding when to buy—and at what price—has never been more difficult.
Go deeper with GlobalData
Discover B2B Marketing That Performs
Combine business intelligence and editorial excellence to reach engaged professionals across 36 leading media platforms.
From petrochemical feedstocks to recycled polymers, price swings have intensified under the combined pressures of geopolitical instability, supply chain disruption, tariffs, regulatory change and shifting consumer demand. The impact on costs is constant and unforgiving.
Unlike colleagues purchasing energy, metals or agricultural commodities, packaging procurement teams have historically had no access to hedging tools. There are no robust futures markets for virgin polyethylene, polypropylene, PET, RPET or recycled polymers.
No futures market means no hedging. It has simply not been possible to construct financial strategies that mitigate exposure to price shifts in these materials because the instruments do not exist.
Instead, procurement teams have relied on contractual pass-through clauses, short-term purchasing cycles and inventory buffers—mechanisms that offer only limited protection in fast-moving markets.
US Tariffs are shifting - will you react or anticipate?
Don’t let policy changes catch you off guard. Stay proactive with real-time data and expert analysis.
By GlobalDataAll the while, margins have tightened, making the consequences of mis-timing purchases increasingly severe.
From unmanageable exposure to insurable risk
That dynamic is now changing.
A new generation of artificial intelligence is transforming how raw material price risk in packaging can be understood, quantified and managed. AI-driven risk modelling capabilities have made it possible, for the first time, to render packaging raw material price volatility insurable.
Historically, insurers were reluctant to underwrite such exposure. Pricing in packaging polymers is influenced by a web of interrelated factors: upstream feedstock costs, refinery capacity, shipping flows, regional demand imbalances, regulatory developments and recycling economics.
The data was vast, noisy and difficult to interpret. Insurance requires measurable and reasonably predictable risk. Until now, that threshold could not be met.
Advanced machine-learning systems are changing the equation. These algorithms ingest and analyse enormous datasets—historical pricing, feedstock trends, refinery operations, trade flows, macroeconomic indicators and more. They identify causal relationships and complex correlations previously hidden within fragmented information.
With this level of granularity, price behaviour can be modelled with sufficient precision for insurers to quantify downside exposure within defined parameters. Tier-one underwriters can now feel confident in structuring policies that cover defined raw material price thresholds.
For packaging companies, this represents a structural shift. For the first time, a portion of raw material price risk can be transferred to the insurance market.
Real price mitigation for everyone
The implications extend well beyond balance sheet stability. This is not simply about smoothing volatility; it is about enabling genuine price mitigation rather than reactive cost pass-through.
With AI-enabled insurance mechanisms, companies can secure protection against agreed price movements. If raw material costs exceed defined thresholds, the policy responds. Procurement teams gain greater certainty. Budget forecasting becomes more reliable. Capital allocation decisions can be taken without excessive contingency buffers. Risk management moves from reactive to proactive.
There is also a practical reality worth acknowledging. While hedging has technically existed in other commodity sectors, it has largely been accessible only to the largest corporations capable of supporting derivatives trading teams and managing accounting complexity.
In theory, hedging was available to everyone. In practice, it resembled rooms at the Ritz—open, but out of reach for most.
Insurance, by contrast, is familiar and accessible. Businesses routinely insure fleets, property and liability exposures. Extending that mechanism to packaging raw materials represents a far more inclusive and operationally straightforward solution.
Unlocking sustainability: the RPET opportunity
The impact may be even more profound in recycled materials markets, particularly recycled polyethylene terephthalate (RPET).
Brands across global markets are under increasing pressure to meet circular economy targets and regulatory mandates. Interest in recycled content has grown rapidly. Yet adoption has lagged behind ambition. The reason, once again, has been volatility.
RPET pricing has proven notoriously unstable. Supply constraints, collection inefficiencies, fluctuating bale costs and competition from virgin PET have created sharp price swings.
The supply chain is globally interconnected and complex; trade policy shifts can reverberate through multiple borders and processing stages. This unpredictability has discouraged long-term commitments from brands and converters alike.
Companies are ultimately accountable to shareholders and driven by cost discipline. However strong sustainability intentions may be, financial unpredictability constrains decision-making.
AI-based modelling changes this dynamic. By creating structured and quantifiable risk profiles around RPET pricing, insurers can now underwrite defined exposure levels. For the first time, meaningful RPET price risk mitigation becomes possible.
History offers a useful precedent. The packaging industry’s shift from steel to aluminium cans accelerated dramatically after aluminium futures were introduced on the London Metal Exchange in 1978, providing transparency and hedging tools that reduced volatility and enabled large-scale adoption.
AI-enabled insurance now has the potential to play a similarly catalytic role for recycled plastics.
A structural shift for the industry
Adoption will build progressively as insurers, manufacturers and brand owners gain confidence in the models and structures. But the foundational shift is already visible. What was once considered opaque and unmanageable volatility can now be measured, structured and transferred.
For an industry navigating decarbonisation targets, regulatory complexity and persistent supply chain uncertainty, this represents more than incremental improvement. It signals a redefinition of risk management in packaging.
Volatility is no longer simply a cost of doing business. With AI, packaging price risk has become insurable—and that may prove to be the catalyst for a more stable, and greener, future for the sector.
About the Author: Tristan Fletcher is Founder and CEO of ChAI Protect, an AI-driven parametric insurance solution protecting manufacturers from raw material price volatility.
