Packaging design affects more than whether a used pack is technically recyclable. It can also determine whether recovering the material offers enough value to make collection, sorting and sale worthwhile.
For waste pickers — workers who recover materials for reuse or recycling — package design can influence handling time, the quality of recovered material and the price buyers are prepared to pay.
Go deeper with GlobalData
Discover B2B Marketing That Performs
Combine business intelligence and editorial excellence to reach engaged professionals across 36 leading media platforms.
This presents a practical challenge for packaging manufacturers, converters and brand owners operating internationally. A pack may meet production and performance requirements while still being difficult or uneconomic to recover through local recycling systems.
A September 2026 paper from the Consumer Goods Forum (CGF), an industry organisation, examines this relationship in low- and middle-income countries.
It cites an estimate that informal waste workers collect and sort around 27 million tonnes of plastic waste each year, representing approximately 60% of plastic recovered for recycling globally. The estimate concerns plastic recovered for recycling, rather than all plastic waste generated.
The paper highlights why designing for recycling requires an understanding of what happens after use, including the work of those who collect, sort and process packaging.
Why recycling value matters to waste pickers
Waste pickers collect, separate and sell recyclable materials, either directly to recyclers or through intermediaries. Their earnings depend on the quantity and quality of what they recover, buyer prices and the time and costs involved.
Packaging that is easy to identify, sort and sell can provide a stronger incentive for collection. Contaminated packs, difficult-to-separate components or formats that local buyers cannot process may have little commercial value, even if recycling is technically possible elsewhere.
Design affects this calculation at several stages. Components that take longer to separate increase handling effort, while incompatible materials can reduce the quality of a recovered stream. Both can make recovery less commercially attractive.
Higher material value does not automatically translate into higher worker income, however. Transport costs, access to buyers, intermediary arrangements and fluctuating prices also influence what a waste picker ultimately receives.
How PET colour affects material value
Colour illustrates how a packaging specification can influence recycling economics.
The CGF paper cites examples in which clear polyethylene terephthalate (PET) commands higher prices than coloured alternatives.
In Colombia, it reports prices around three times those of coloured PET. In Indonesia, collectors reportedly receive around 66% more for clear PET. These are examples cited by the paper, rather than current price benchmarks for every market.
For designers, the question is whether colour is necessary and how it affects the material’s value after use.
A colour selected for branding can limit the applications available to a recycler or require separation into a different material stream. The effect depends on local recycling processes and demand for the resulting material.
This does not mean every PET package should be clear. Product protection and functional performance remain important. Packaging teams should establish which colours recyclers accept and whether buyers apply different prices or quality requirements.
Why labels, adhesives and closures matter
Assessing only the main packaging material gives an incomplete picture of recyclability.
Labels, adhesives, inks, closures, liners and seals can affect identification, separation and processing. A PET bottle or high-density polyethylene (HDPE) container may use a widely recycled polymer while incorporating components that cause problems during recycling.
The CGF recommends compatible components for PET bottles and rigid HDPE packaging, appropriate ink selection and limited direct printing where suitable. These recommendations reinforce the need to assess the complete pack.
Questions for recyclers should be specific. Can the label be separated effectively? Does the adhesive interfere with washing? How are closures and seals handled? Does the recovered material meet buyer specifications?
A change that simplifies processing or preserves material quality may improve recovery economics. Its benefits still need to be tested against the processes and markets available locally.
Why recyclability depends on local systems
A technically recyclable pack needs a viable route through collection, sorting, processing and sale.
Those conditions vary between countries and within them. Collection coverage, transport distances, sorting equipment, recycling capacity and demand for recovered materials all influence what happens to used packaging.
A pack may be sorted manually in one system and mechanically in another. A format accepted by a specialist recycler may have no accessible buyer where it is discarded.
For international businesses, this means assessing packaging in individual markets rather than assuming a global specification will perform identically everywhere. Recyclability claims should reflect the collection and processing routes realistically available where a product is sold.
Waste-picker organisations can provide practical evidence about which materials buyers accept, how much effort particular formats require and which packs are regularly left behind.
Their experience can reveal barriers that assessments focused on production or recycling equipment may overlook.
Disposal information also needs local assessment. Clear instructions can help consumers separate used packaging, but they should use appropriate languages and reflect available collection routes. A recycling symbol alone does not establish that a pack will be collected or processed.
What packaging companies should check before redesigning
Packaging manufacturers, converters and brand owners can make better-informed decisions by connecting design specifications to evidence from the recovery chain.
Confirm demand for the material. Identify who buys the used packaging, the condition in which it must arrive and the specifications it must meet.
Assess the complete pack. Review labels, adhesives, inks, closures and seals alongside the main material. Test compatibility with recycling processes used in target markets.
Review colour and complexity. Establish whether colouring, additional materials or difficult-to-separate components affect sorting effort, buyer acceptance or recovered-material value.
Check disposal information. Ensure instructions are clear, accurate and appropriate for locally available collection routes.
Engage waste-picker organisations. Ask how a proposed design affects handling time, saleable material and collection value. Involve workers early enough for their experience to influence specifications.
Maintain packaging performance. Any redesign must continue to meet product protection, safety, shelf-life and functional requirements.
Connecting packaging design with recovery
Better design can remove avoidable barriers to recycling. It cannot, on its own, provide collection infrastructure, stable material markets or decent working conditions.
Recovered packaging value also depends on transport costs, recycling capacity, buyer requirements and how collection is organised.
Higher-value materials should therefore complement broader efforts to improve worker livelihoods, rather than substitute for fair payment, social protection or safer working conditions.
For packaging companies, the practical test extends beyond whether a pack can be recycled under ideal conditions. Can it be identified, collected, sorted, accepted by buyers and processed through a viable system where it is sold?
Answering those questions with recyclers and waste-picker organisations connects packaging decisions to recovery — and to the people whose livelihoods depend on it.
