The UK ‘consistently overestimates’ the amount of plastic packaging that actually ends up being recycled, a report by waste consultancy Eunomia has claimed.

In its report ‘Plastic Packaging – Shedding Light on the UK Data’ the firm says that official figures exaggerate the quantity of plastic sent to recycling by about a third.

Discover B2B Marketing That Performs

Combine business intelligence and editorial excellence to reach engaged professionals across 36 leading media platforms.

Find out more

According to the paper, official Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) statistics show that in 2015 British households and businesses were responsible for 2.26 million tonnes of plastic waste, 39% of which was recycled.

However, the study suggests that the numbers are wrong, claiming that the actual amount of waste was approximately 3.5 million tonnes. Eunomia’s report goes on to say that the majority of what goes into waste could be of such poor quality that it is not recyclable.

If these figures are correct, the UK may have failed to meet its recycling targets under the EU’s directive between 2008 and 2012.

Eunomia chairman Dominic Hogg said: “It’s not really surprising to find that the UK’s recycling rate for plastics is not as good as is claimed. The scheme supports the reporting of compliance at low cost, rather than achieving high-quality recycling of plastic packaging.”

GlobalData Strategic Intelligence

US Tariffs are shifting - will you react or anticipate?

Don’t let policy changes catch you off guard. Stay proactive with real-time data and expert analysis.

By GlobalData

The report mentions Valpak, the UK’s largest compliance firm that is responsible for running the Packaging Recovery Note scheme. Valpak gathers official data on the quantity of plastic packaging placed on the market and therefore extrapolates from its own figures. Yet, according to Eunomia, the lower the figure for the packaging placed on the market, the fewer producers will have to pay for the recycling and collecting schemes.

Low figures mean that fewer plastics needs to be recycled in order to meet the targets, helping the industry cut down costs of compliance.

Hogg said that when packaging is released on the market it is clean, dry and free from labels and other extra materials. However, when the collected plastic is measured for recycling, the weight increases due to moisture, contaminants and labels.

He added: “The disparities between datasets indicate that the existing scheme gives a weak foundation on which to base the recycling figures. The existing system of producer responsibility is failing. It has allowed problems with plastic packaging to grow, and in its most basic responsibility, demonstrating compliance with a target, the data cannot be trusted.”

Packaging Gateway Excellence Awards - The Benefits of Entering

Gain the recognition you deserve! The Packaging Gateway Excellence Awards celebrate innovation, leadership, and impact. By entering, you showcase your achievements, elevate your industry profile, and position yourself among top leaders driving packaging industry advancements. Don’t miss your chance to stand out—submit your entry today!

Nominate Now